Willis v. Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
ORDER denying 51 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 51 Motion to Amend/Correct; finding as moot 52 Motion to Stay; finding as moot 54 Motion for Order; denying 55 Motion to Set Aside Order; finding as moot 56 Motion for Order. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 12/4/09. (bkp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION NATALIE WILLIS V. 4:09CV00490 JMM DEFENDANTS ORDER Pending are the Plaintiff's motions for reconsideration and to set aside the Court's Order of October 1, 2009. Plaintiff makes these requests, in large part, pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 60(b) allows the Court to relieve a party from a final judgment if the judgment was based upon a mistake, newly discovered evidence, fraud, or if the judgment is void or has been satisfied. The Rule also allows the Court to relieve the party from judgment for "any other reason that justifies relief." Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). In her motions, Plaintiff reiterates her previous arguments which the Court considered before ruling on the Defendants' motions for summary judgment. There is no mistake, newly discovered evidence or fraud alleged. The Court further finds that there is no other reason that justifies relief in this matter. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration and to set aside (Docket # 51 and # 55) are DENIED. Plaintiff's remaining motions (Docket # 52, # 54, and # 56) are DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of December, 2009. PLAINTIFF
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, ET AL
______________________________ James M. Moody United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?