Smith et al v. Frac Tech Services LTD

Filing 325

ORDER granting as to the claims of Brady Borden as safety coordinator and dismissing those claims with prejudice 231 ; finding as moot 245 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; finding as moot 251 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 10/28/10. (bkp)

Download PDF
Smith et al v. Frac Tech Services Ltd Doc. 325 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION DAVID SMITH, et al. v. FRAC TECH SERVICES, LTD. ORDE R Frac Tech Services, Ltd., has filed a motion for partial summary judgment as to the claims of Brady Borden as safety coordinator. The lawyer for the plaintiffs has informed the Court in writing that Borden has no good faith argument to contest the motion. Therefore, the motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED as to the claims of Brady Borden as safety coordinator. Document #231. Brady Borden's claims brought in his capacity as safety coordinator are dismissed with prejudice. This order does not address Brady Borden's claims brought in his capacity as a service supervisor. Frac Tech Services has also filed a motion for partial summary judgment as to the claims of Claiborne Lee as health safety manager. The Court has recently granted Claiborne Lee's motion for voluntary non-suit and dismissed his claims with prejudice. Therefore, the motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED AS MOOT. Document #245. Frac Tech Services filed a motion for partial summary judgment as to the claims of Robert Pulse as central area electronics manager. The Court has recently granted Robert Pulse's motion for voluntary non-suit and dismissed his claims with prejudice. Therefore, the motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED AS MOOT. Document #251. IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of October, 2010. No. 4:09CV00679 JLH DEFENDANT PLAINTIFFS J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?