Fuller v. Dillard's Inc

Filing 45

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 41 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 9/22/10. (bkp)

Download PDF
Fuller v. Dillard's Inc Doc. 45 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LINDA FULLER V. DILLARD'S, INC. ORDER Pending is the Plaintiff's Renewed Motion to Compel. The Defendant has responded to the motion. After review of the pleadings, the Court has made the following rulings: Interrogatory No. 7 and 8 and RFP 8: The Defendant is ordered to provide the information requested in Interrogatories 7 and 8 and RFP 8. The request is limited, however, to employees or former employees making complaints about (1) Ken Maddux, (2) the store manager(s) at the time Plaintiff was an employee of the store, (3) the assistant store manager(s) at the time Plaintiff was an employee of the store, or (4) the department manager(s) in the departments where Plaintiff was employed. Interrogatory No. 10: The Defendant is ordered to provide the information requested in this interrogatory. Interrogatory No. 11 and RFP 14 and 19: The Defendant is ordered to provide the information requested for the time period Plaintiff worked at the store. Further, the interrogatories and the request are limited to the Pine Bluff Dillards store. RFP 17: The Defendant is ordered to provide the information requested in RFP 17. The Defendant need not include information regarding Dillards' purchasing or ordering of shoes for the department, or Dillards' profit margins in the shoe department. Accordingly, the Motion to Compel (Docket # 41) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in 4:09CV00709 JMM DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF Dockets.Justia.com part. IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of September, 2010. ______________________________ James M. Moody United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?