Bolden v. Johnson et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6 ; dismissing this action with prejudice and counting the dismissal as a "strike"; and certifying that an ifp appeal from any order adopting these recommendations would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/13/09. (bkp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK DIVISION STERLING BOLDEN ADC # 116552 PCRFD # 6026-09*1 v. 4:09-cv-00720-BSM-JJV
CARL JOHNSON, Dr., Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility; and CHARLES "DOC" HOLIDAY, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility ORDER
The court has reviewed the proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the court concludes that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice, and the dismissal of this action
counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).1 2. The court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma
pauperis appeal from any order adopting these recommendations would not be taken in good Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) provides that: "In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted . . . ."
faith. DATED this 13th day of October, 2009.
________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?