Morgan v. Proctor et al

Filing 35

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 7/19/10. (bkp)

Download PDF
Morgan v. Proctor et al Doc. 35 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION DERRICK MORGAN, Plaintiff, vs. WILLARD PROCTOR, ET AL., Defendants. * * * * * * * * * * Order Pending before the Court are two motions to dismiss and a motion to compel to which plaintiff failed to respond. On May 14, 2010, the Court sent plaintiff by certified and regular mail an Order directing him to respond to the motions, warning him that failure to do so could result in the dismissal of his case. Plaintiff's certified mail has been returned to the Court as undeliverable. Plaintiff has failed to respond to the motions or otherwise correspond with the Court.. Local Rule 5.5 (c)(2) provides that it is the duty of a party not represented by counsel to promptly notify the Clerk of any change in his address, to monitor the progress of the case, and to prosecute the action diligently. If any communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to within thirty (30) days, the case may be dismissed without prejudice. The Court finds plaintiff complaint should be and is hereby dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). SO ORDERED this19th day of July, 2010. No. 4:09CV00744 SWW /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?