Bank of America NA v. Joshua

Filing 49

ORDER awarding Bank of America $5,386.712.21 as of 3/10/2011, plus $665.78 per day for ongoing interest between 3/9/2011, and the date judgment is entered. Post judgment interest will continue to run at the rate of 0.18 percent per annum. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 7/26/2011. (kdr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 4:09-CV-00745 BSM THELMA JOSHUA, individually; THELMA JOSHUA, as trustee of THE THELMA JOSHUA REVOCABLE TRUST; and THELMA JOSHUA as TRUSTEE of THE ERNEST P. JOSHUA REVOCABLE TRUST DEFENDANT ORDER On February 7, 2011, Bank of Amerca’s motion for summary judgement was granted. [Doc. No. 42]. Bank of America was asked to submit a damages calculation for review. Bank of America has submitted its final calculations [Doc. No. 43], and defendants have replied [Doc. No. 46]. Defendants object to the costs and attorney’s fees incurred by Bank of America, contending that $596,714.78 is unreasonable. Defendants, however, agreed to pay legal costs and expenses incurred by Bank of America defending its rights in the underlying loan and enforcing the guaranty. See Summ. J. Order 4–5. As per the contract, Bank of America is entitled to these costs and fees. The pleadings also indicate that there is nothing unreasonable about the costs incurred by Bank of America to defend its rights in the underlying loan or to enforce the guaranty. Bank of America is awarded $5,386,712.21 as of March 9, 2011, plus $665.78 per day for ongoing interest between March 9, 2011, and the date judgment is entered. Post judgment interest will continue to run at the rate of 0.18 percent per annum. IT IS SO ORDERED this 26th day of July 2011. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?