Storay v. Little Rock Police Department
ORDER granting 34 Motion for More Definite Statement and directing plaintiff to file an amended complaint by 5 p.m., Wednesday, January 27, 2010. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 1/13/10. (bkp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION ROBERT STORAY V. CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, et al. ORDER Defendants' Motion for a More Definite Statement (Doc. No. 34) is GRANTED. Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, must, by 5 p.m., Wednesday, January 27, 2010, file an amended complaint that complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure -- specifically, Rule 8, which reads: General Rules of Pleading (a) Claim for Relief. A pleading that states a claim for relief must contain: (1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction, unless the court already has jurisdiction and the claim needs no new jurisdictional support; (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief; and (3) a demand for the relief sought, which may include relief in the alternative or different types of relief.1 Additionally, again, Plaintiff is instructed to "specifically set out the capacity in which [he] is suing" Officer O'Kelly, Officer Smith, and Sgt. Helton.2 IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of January, 2010. /s/Wm. R. Wilson, Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4:09CV00788-WRW DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF
Fed. R. Civ. P. 8. Doc. No. 28.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?