Williams v. Byrd et al
Filing
53
ORDER adopting 52 Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe's Proposed Findings and Recommendations; and granting in part and denying in part 17 Defendants' motion for summary judgment. Williams's claim about being denied access to the grievance procedure is dismissed with prejudice. In all other respects, the motion for summary judgment is denied. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/22/11. (hph)
Williams v. Byrd et al
Doc. 53
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
JASON M. WILLIAMS PLAINTIFF
v.
Case No. 4:09-cv-836-DPM-JJV
KARL BYRD, Sheriff, Faulkner County; BOBBY BROWN, Major, Faulkner County Sheriff's Office; and NEAL, Corporal, Faulkner County Sheriff's Office
DEFENDANTS
ORDER The Court has considered Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe's Proposed Findings and Recommendations, Document No. 52. No one has objected. Having reviewed the proposal for clear errors of fact on the face of the record, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (advisory committee notes to 1983 addition), and for legal error, the Court adopts the recommendation as its own. Defendants' motion for summary judgment, Document No. 17, is granted in part and denied in part. Williams's claim about being denied access to the grievance procedure is dismissed with prejudice. In all other respects, the motion for summary judgment is denied.
Dockets.Justia.com
So Ordered.
-2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?