Windstream Corporation et al v. Da Gragnano et al

Filing 63

ORDER granting 62 Agreed Motion to Dismiss Deft Thomas Case; Deft Thomas Case, and Deft Case's counterclaim against Pltfs are hereby dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/17/10. (vjt)

Download PDF
Windstream Corporation et al v. Da Gragnano et al Doc. 63 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION WINDSTREAM CORPORATION, WINDSTREAM BENEFITS COMMITTEE, WINDSTREAM SYSTEMS OF THE MIDWEST, INC., and VALOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF TEXAS, L.P., d/b/a Windstream Communications Southwest -vCRAIG WALLACE, JOHNNY LEE, HELEN E. FRANKS, HOMER A. MEEKINS, FLOYD L. MADISON, DORENE R. FULLER, DONALD H. REMPE, CARMEN M. BRYANT, LINDA SUE DONAHUE, DONALD F. ANTHOLZ, CHARLES J. MOORE, JOSEPH P. WANSOLICH, THOMAS FARRELL WATTS, JACK R. ELLIOT, and TYRONE M. KIMREY, Individually and as Representatives of Persons Similarly Situated PLAINTIFFS Case No. 4:09CV00953 JLH DEFENDANTS ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT THOMAS CASE AND DISMISSING COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST PLAINTIFFS In consideration of the Agreed Motion to Dismiss Defendant Thomas Case, which was jointly submitted by Plaintiffs and Defendant Thomas Case, this Court hereby ORDERS that Defendant Thomas Case is dismissed without prejudice and Defendant Case's counterclaim against Plaintiffs is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 17th day of August, 2010. ___________________________________ J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?