USA v. Fowler
ORDER ENFORCING IRS SUMMONS granting 1 United States' Petition to Enforce and directing the Clerk to close the case. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 11/18/2009. (thd)
TN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1[) 1-00 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANScMMES BY:_J.J.J~::in!~~~_ DEP LE ) U N I T E D STATES OF AMERlCA, ) Petitioner ) ) C a s e No. 4:09-MC-00025 )
PAUL E. FOWLER, ) ) Respondent )
ORDER ENFORCING IRS SUMMONS nlis matter is before the COllrt on the United States' Petition to Enforce an IRS Summons (Docket #1). The Respondent, Paul E. Fowler, filed a Response to the United States' Petition on November 17,2009, in which Respondent states he does not object to the enforcement of the fRS Summons. The Court has reviewed the case file and now, it is accordingly, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 26. U.S.c. §§ 7402 and 7604(a) and by 28 U.S.c. §§ 1340 and 1345; 2. The United States has adduced evidence sufficient to meet the required burden, as articulated in United States v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48 (1964), by showing that the summons was issued for a legitimate purpose, that it seeks information that may be relevant to that purpose, the information sought is not already within the IRS's possession, and all the administrative steps have been satisfied in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code; and
Respondent, Paul E. Fowler, shall fully obey the subject summons and each requirement to attend, testify, and/or produce that is called for by the terms of the Summons, before Revenue Agent Yvonne Taylor, or any other proper officer or employee of the IRS, at such time and place as may be set by Revenue Agent or any other officer or employee of the IRS
The United States' Petition to Enforce (Docket #1) is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED this
of November, 2009.
HON. United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?