Hollamon v. Frito Lay Inc

Filing 84

ORDER denying 76 Motion to Compel and for Motion for Sanctions. Plaintiff is ordered to respond to Frito Lay's pending motion for summary judgment within 15 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 3/24/11. (kpr)

Hollamon v. Frito Lay Inc

Doc. 84

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION KEVIN HOLLAMON v. FRITO LAY, INC. ORDER A telephonic hearing was held today on plaintiff Kevin Hollamon's motion to compel and for sanctions. [Doc. No. 76]. Hollamon appeared pro se and Gregg Lemley appeared as counsel for Frito Lay, Inc. Based on the statements of the parties and the record, Hollamon's motion [Doc. No. 76] is denied. Hollamon is ordered to respond to Frito Lay's pending motion for summary judgment [Doc. Nos. 64-66] within fifteen days of the date of this order. Dated this 24th day of March, 2011. CASE NO. 4:10CV00011 BSM DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF

_________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com