Ruby v. Givens et al

Filing 8

ORDER adopting 6 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, pltf's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and failure to respond to the Court's Order 4 ; judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 5/6/10. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK DIVISION RICK R. RUBY V. GIVENS et al., ORDER The court has reviewed the recommended disposition submitted by Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After carefully reviewing the CASE NO: 4:10CV00067 BSM HDY DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF recommended disposition and reviewing the record de novo, it is concluded that the recommended disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety in all respects. Accordingly, plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and failure to respond to the court's February 17, 2010, order (Doc. No. 4). Additionally, it is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from any order adopting these recommendations would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of May, 2010. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?