Harper v. Does
ORDER denying 12 Motion for Reconsideration ; granting 13 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 7/12/10. (bkp)
Harper v. Does
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION EDWARD ARNEILL HARPER V. TEXARKANA WORK RELEASE MEDICAL STAFF ORDE R Pending is the Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration and motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's complaint was dismissed by the Court on June 15, 2010 for failure to file an amended complaint as directed by Order dated April 30, 2010. On July 9, Plaintiff filed his motion for reconsideration and motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis stating that he had been transferred to work release in Luxora, Arkansas during the months of April, May and June and did not have a law library or legal counseling during that time. In addition, Plaintiff includes a copy of one page of his original complaint entitled Statement of Claim. Plaintiff has, again, failed to identify any defendants by name or position/job assignment. Plaintiff has failed to include specific facts concerning his allegations such as dates, times, places, and what constitutional rights he believes were violated. For this reason, Plaintiff has failed to set forth a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to § 1983. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Docket # 12) is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion to appeal in forma pauperis (Docket # 13) is GRANTED. 4:10CV000197 JMM DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF
IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of July, 2010.
______________________________ James M. Moody United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?