King v. Green et al
ORDER directing the Clerk to correct name of deft Carl Johnson (originally sued as Johnson); the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve summons, substituted complaint 6 , and this Order on defts Johnson and Green (ADDRESSES FILED UNDER SEAL), without prepayment of fees and costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 8/17/10. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK DIVISION ROBERT KING ADC #110796 V. BOBBY GREEN et al. ORDE R Plaintiff filed a substituted complaint on June 16, 2010, and service was ordered. On August 16, 2010, the summons was returned un-executed as to Defendants Johnson and Bobby Green (docket entries #17 & #18). However, the Court has obtained last known addresses for Johnson and Bobby Green, and will attempt service at those addresses. The information provided also indicates that Johnson's first name is Carl; therefore Johnson's first name will be added. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. The Clerk is directed to change the style of the case to reflect the correct name of NO: 4:10CV00312 JLH/HDY DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF
Defendant Carl Johnson. 2. record. 3. The Clerk of the Court shall prepare a summons for Johnson and Green, and the The addresses of Defendants Johnson and Green shall not be made part of any public
United States Marshal is hereby directed to serve a copy of the summons and substituted complaint (docket entry #6), and this order, on Johnson, at the office address provided under seal, and on Green, at the home address provided under seal, without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. 1
Upon re-issuance of the summons and complaint, the United States Marshal is hereby
directed to send Plaintiff's copy of process to the Clerk of the Court, who shall then remove the address prior to forwarding a copy to Plaintiff. DATED this 17 day of August, 2010.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?