Onks v. Staffmark

Filing 12

ORDER directing plaintiff to respond to deft's 9 MOTION to Dismiss within fourteen days after entry of this order. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 6/21/10. (bkp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION CAROL ONKS v. STAFFMARK CASE NO. 4:10cv00468 JMM ORDE R Plaintiff is presently proceeding pro se. The purpose of this Order is to direct Plaintiff's attention to the fact that he is required to be familiar and comply with all Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as well as the Local Rules of this Court. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are available in many libraries and bookstores and the Local Rules can be obtained from the District Clerk for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Plaintiff is instructed to be familiar and comply with said Rules. Plaintiff must be familiar with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), which provides that: "It is the duty of any party not represented by counsel to promptly notify the Clerk and the other parties to the proceedings of any change in his or her address, to monitor the progress of the case, and to prosecute or defend the action diligently. A party appearing for himself/herself shall sign his/her pleadings and state his/her address, zip code, and telephone number. If any communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to within thirty (30) days, the case may be dismissed without prejudice. Any party proceeding pro se shall be expected to be familiar with and follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure." Pending is Defendant's motion to dismiss (DE #9). Plaintiff is directed to file a response to the motion fourteen (14) days after entry of this order. Failure to file a response may result in dismissal of the case. IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of June, 2010. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?