Taylor v. University of Central Arkansas et al

Filing 104

ORDER denying 103 Motion for New Trial; denying 103 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 5/18/12. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION FELICIA D. TAYLOR V. PLAINTIFF 4:10CV00549 JMM THE UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS, ET AL. DEFENDANTS ORDER Pending is Plaintiff’s Motion for New Trial Pursuant to Rule 59, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and to Correct Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On March 14, 2012, the Court granted the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and closed the case. The Court thoroughly reviewed the evidence and each of the claims alleged by the Plaintiff but found that each claim was lacking. In her Motion, Plaintiff asks the Court to reconsider the Order pursuant to Rules 59 and 60. The Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to set forth any grounds for relief from the Order granting summary judgment. There is no evidence of mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect, newly discovered evidence, fraud, or “any other reason that justifies relief.” See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Accordingly, the Motion (ECF No. 103) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of May, 2012. ______________________________ James M. Moody United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?