Tucker v. Buckman et al
ORDER denying 91 Motion for Summary Judgment without prejudice ; granting 95 Motion to Amend/Correct. The Clerk is directed to docket Exhibit A to document no. 95 as Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 4/11/12. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TROY ALLEN TUCKER
JOSEPH BUCKMAN, et al.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend (Doc. No. 95) is GRANTED, pursuant to FED.R.CIV.P. 15. In
light of this Order, Defendant Johnson’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 91) is DENIED
without prejudice, subject to renewal. The Clerk of the Court is directed to docket Exhibit A to
Document No. 95 as Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint.
No further amendments will be
IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of April, 2012.
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?