Tucker v. Buckman et al

Filing 17

ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney's proposed findings and recommendations; directing Plaintiff to proceed with his claims against Defendants Doc Holiday, Carl Johnson, Mrs. C. Smith, Nurse Anderson, and Nurse Washburn; directing the Clerk of the Court to prepare a summons for the Defendants and the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve a copy of the 8 Amended Complaint, summons, this Partial Recommendation, and any Order adopting this Partial Recommendation upon Defendants wit hout prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore; dimsissing Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Pulaski County Detention Facility, Wright, and Lacking for failure to state a claim; and dismissing all remaining claims and Defendants, without prejudice, so that the Plaintiff may pursue them, if he so chooses, in a separately filed action. Signed by Judge G. Thomas Eisele on 9/22/10. (hph)

-JTK Tucker v. Buckman et al

Doc. 17

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION TROY ALLEN TUCKER, ADC #86899 v. JOSEPH BUCKMAN, et al. 4:10CV00749GTE/JTK DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF

ORDER The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED: 1) Plaintiff shall proceed with his claims against Defendants Doc Holiday, Carl Johnson,
Mrs. C. Smith, Nurse Anderson, and Nurse Washburn.

2) The Clerk of the Court shall prepare summons for the Defendants and the United States Marshal is hereby directed to serve a copy of the amended complaint (Doc. No. 8), summons, this Partial Recommendation, and any Order adopting this Partial Recommendation upon Defendants without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore. 3) Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Pulaski County Detention Facility, Wright, and Lacking, are hereby DISMISSED for failure to state a claim. 4) All remaining claims and Defendants are hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice, so that Plaintiff may pursue them, if he so chooses, in a separately-filed action. IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of September, 2010.

_/s/Garnett Thomas Eisele_____________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com