Wright v. North Little Rock Arkansas, City of
Filing
12
ORDER granting 10 Motion to Compel and directing plaintiff to provide responses to the first set of interrogs and first set of requests for production within 30 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 4/12/11. (kpr)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
DENAE WRIGHT
v.
PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 4:10cv00755 BSM
CITY OF NORTH LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS
DEFENDANT
ORDER
Defendant City of North Little Rock, Arkansas (“North Little Rock”) moves to
compel plaintiff Denae Wright (“Wright”) to provide responses to its first set of
interrogatories and first set of requests for production of documents. [Doc. No. 10]. Wright
has not responded. For good cause shown, the motion is granted.
North Little Rock propounded its first set of interrogatories and first set of requests
for production to Wright on October 14, 2010, and Wright had thirty days to respond. To
date, she has failed to provide any responses. Accordingly, North Little Rock’s motion is
granted, and Wright is directed to provide responses to the first set of interrogatories and first
set of requests for production within thirty days of the date of this order. Failure to do so may
result in the dismissal of her case. North Little Rock is awarded its costs associated with the
filing of its motion, and is directed to file a fee petition forthwith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of April, 2011.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?