Crews & Associates Inc v. Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund et al

Filing 52

AMENDED ORDER 49 denying 41 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 6/30/11. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION CREWS & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 4:10-cv-1098 BSM NUVEEN HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL BOND FUND et al. DEFENDANT AMENDED ORDER Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (“Nuveen”) moves [Doc. No. 41] to dismiss the declaratory judgment action based on an unconditional covenant not to assert a claim under Section 10b of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Crews & Associates (“Crews”) objects stating that the covenant is not a final judicially enforceable agreement. The motion is DENIED. The order [Doc. No. 36] entered on March 29, 2011, declined to dismiss the claim without a judicially binding agreement on the issue. The current unilateral promise does not represent a judicially binding agreement between the parties. As such, Nuveen is still entitled to pursue declaratory judgment on the Section 10b claims, and the motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 41] is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of June 2011. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?