Brown v. Pollock et al

Filing 47

ORDER finding as moot 37 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 7/1/11. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION PATRICK IGWE BROWN, ADC ##6004 v. PLAINTIFF 4:10-cv-01102-JMM-JTK JOSE POLLOCK, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 37). Plaintiff filed Responses to the Motion (Doc. Nos. 45, 46). In their Motion, Defendants state Plaintiff has not responded to their discovery requests. Plaintiff responds by stating he did not receive their Motion, but that he has assembled the information they requested. In an additional Notice to the Court (Doc. No. 46), Plaintiff filed his responses to Defendants’ discovery requests. In light of such, the Court finds that Defendants’ Motion is now moot. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 37) is DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of July, 2011. ______________________________________ JEROME T. KEARNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?