Brown v. Pollock et al
Filing
47
ORDER finding as moot 37 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 7/1/11. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
PATRICK IGWE BROWN,
ADC ##6004
v.
PLAINTIFF
4:10-cv-01102-JMM-JTK
JOSE POLLOCK, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 37). Plaintiff
filed Responses to the Motion (Doc. Nos. 45, 46).
In their Motion, Defendants state Plaintiff has not responded to their discovery requests.
Plaintiff responds by stating he did not receive their Motion, but that he has assembled the
information they requested. In an additional Notice to the Court (Doc. No. 46), Plaintiff filed his
responses to Defendants’ discovery requests. In light of such, the Court finds that Defendants’
Motion is now moot. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 37) is
DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of July, 2011.
______________________________________
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?