Buford v. Durhman et al
Filing
43
ORDER directing plaintiff to file a response to the 40 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Scott Bradley, Kenny Dunham within 15 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 6/2/11. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
TONY ANDRE BUFORD
v.
PLAINTIFF
4:10-cv-01163-JTK
KENNY DUNHAM, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No.
40). As of this date, Plaintiff has not filed a response to the Motion. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a Response to Defendants’ Motion
for Summary Judgment within fifteen days of the date of this Order. Failure to file such shall result
in the dismissal without prejudice of Plaintiff’s Complaint, for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule
5.5(c)(2).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of June, 2011.
______________________________________
JEROME T. KEARNEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?