Buford v. Durhman et al

Filing 43

ORDER directing plaintiff to file a response to the 40 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Scott Bradley, Kenny Dunham within 15 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 6/2/11. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION TONY ANDRE BUFORD v. PLAINTIFF 4:10-cv-01163-JTK KENNY DUNHAM, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 40). As of this date, Plaintiff has not filed a response to the Motion. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment within fifteen days of the date of this Order. Failure to file such shall result in the dismissal without prejudice of Plaintiff’s Complaint, for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of June, 2011. ______________________________________ JEROME T. KEARNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?