Wilson et al v. Morrilton Arkansas, City of et al

Filing 32

ORDER denying 22 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 9/21/11. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION BRANDON WILSON, et. al, v. PLAINTIFFS 4:10CV01184-BRW MORRILTON, ARKANSAS, CITY OF, et. al, DEFENDANTS ORDER Pending is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Wrongful Death Claim for Failure to Comply with a Court Order Regarding Disclosure of Expert Report and for Failure to Prosecute (Doc. No. 22). Plaintiffs have responded1 and Defendants have replied.2 Defendants filed their Motion on September 2, 2011, arguing that Plaintiffs failed to meet the August 15, 2011, deadline, to provide the “requisite case-in-chief expert disclosures.”3 On September 15, 2011, Plaintiffs provided the report and curriculum vitae of their expert, Dr. Frank Peretti, Jr.4 Plaintiffs’ counsel should have met the deadlines, but the problem can be cured by allowing Defendants to take the expert’s deposition. There is time aplenty before the trial. Plaintiffs’ counsel must forthwith furnish Defendants’ counsel with any missing documents or exhibits. Counsel should “meet and confer” (by telephone will be satisfactory) to set up a mutually convenient time for the deposition -- and to establish a near time when Plaintiffs’ counsel will provide the missing documents. If the parties cannot agree upon the date, time, and place for the deposition, I should 1 Doc. No. 24. 2 Doc. No. 30. 3 Doc. No. 23. 4 Doc. No. 28. 1 be notified. I immodestly assert that I am right good at setting such dates, times, and places -- but not always to the satisfaction of counsel and deponent (Saturdays and Sundays are in play). Therefore, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Wrongful Death Claim for Failure to Comply with a Court Order Regarding Disclosure of Expert Report and for Failure to Prosecute (Doc. No. 22) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of September, 2011. /s/Billy Roy Wilson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?