Allen v. Byrd et al
ORDER adopting 10 Partial Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects in its entirety; dismissing Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Byrd without prejudice; dismissing Defendant Byrd as a party Defendant; dismissing Plaintiff's claims regarding the failure of Defendants Brown, Givens, Randall, and Porter to respond to Plaintiff's grievances with prejudice; dismissing Defendants Brown and Randall as party Defendants; and dismissing Plaintiff's conditions of confinement claim with prejudice. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 11/22/2010. (thd)
Allen v. Byrd et al
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION ERIC L. ALLEN V. KARL BYRD, et al. ORDER The Court has received the Partial Recommended Disposition from Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. The parties have not filed objections. After careful review of the Recommendation, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects in its entirety. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Byrd are DISMISSED without prejudice and Defendant Byrd is dismissed as a party Defendant. Plaintiff's claim regarding the failure of Defendants Brown, Givens, Randall, and Porter to respond to Plaintiff's grievances is DISMISSED with prejudice and Defendants Brown and Randall are dismissed as party Defendants. Finally, Plaintiff's conditions of confinement claim is DISMISSED with prejudice. It IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of November, 2010. No. 4:10CV01452 SWW-BD DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF
/s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?