Boyd v. Rausch Coleman Homes/Performance Group

Filing 31

ORDER directing pltf to file a response to deft's 23 Motion to Dismiss and 27 Motion for Summary Judgment by the close of business on Monday, October 31, 2011. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 10/24/11. (vjt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
WYNTER ADONNIS BOYD
v.

PLAINTIFF
No. 4:10CV01612 JLH

RAUSCH COLEMAN
PERFORMANCE GROUP, LLC1

DEFENDANT
ORDER

On September 29, 2011, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to
Rule 37(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On September 30, 2011, the defendant filed a
motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The
plaintiff has not responded to either motion. The Court hereby gives notice to the plaintiff that if
she fails to file a response by the close of business on Monday, October 31, 2011, the Court will
assume that she does not oppose the pending motions and will act accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of October, 2011.

J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

Plaintiff filed her complaint against “Rausch Coleman Homes/Performance Group.”
The defendant has filed its motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment in the name of
“Rausch Coleman Performance Group, LLC.” Documents #23 and #27. The Clerk is directed to
correct the style of the case to show that Rausch Coleman Performance Group, LLC, is the
correct party defendant, replacing Rausch Coleman Homes/Performance Group.