Boyd v. Rausch Coleman Homes/Performance Group

Filing 31

ORDER directing pltf to file a response to deft's 23 Motion to Dismiss and 27 Motion for Summary Judgment by the close of business on Monday, October 31, 2011. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 10/24/11. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION WYNTER ADONNIS BOYD v. PLAINTIFF No. 4:10CV01612 JLH RAUSCH COLEMAN PERFORMANCE GROUP, LLC1 DEFENDANT ORDER On September 29, 2011, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 37(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. On September 30, 2011, the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff has not responded to either motion. The Court hereby gives notice to the plaintiff that if she fails to file a response by the close of business on Monday, October 31, 2011, the Court will assume that she does not oppose the pending motions and will act accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of October, 2011. J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Plaintiff filed her complaint against “Rausch Coleman Homes/Performance Group.” The defendant has filed its motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment in the name of “Rausch Coleman Performance Group, LLC.” Documents #23 and #27. The Clerk is directed to correct the style of the case to show that Rausch Coleman Performance Group, LLC, is the correct party defendant, replacing Rausch Coleman Homes/Performance Group.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?