Boyd v. Rausch Coleman Homes/Performance Group

Filing 33

ORDER in the absence of any response, deft's 27 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 11/1/11. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION WYNTER ADONNIS BOYD v. PLAINTIFF No. 4:10CV01612 JLH RAUSCH COLEMAN PERFORMANCE GROUP, LLC DEFENDANT ORDER On September 29, 2011, Rausch Coleman Performance Group, LLC, filed a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 37(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because the plaintiff, Wynter Adonnis Boyd, failed to appear at her deposition despite proper notice. On September 30, 2011, Rausch Coleman also filed a motion for summary judgment. Boyd did not respond to either motion. On October 24, 2011, the Court entered an Order notifying Boyd that if she failed to respond to those two motions by the close of business on Monday, October 31, 2011, the Court would assume that she does not oppose the motions and would act accordingly. Boyd has not filed a response. Rausch Coleman has presented a prima facie case of entitlement to summary judgment. In the absence of any response, the motion is GRANTED. Document #27. IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of November, 2011. J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?