Bly v. Dodson et al

Filing 14

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11 and dismissing the case without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and failure to respond to the December 3, 2010, order; and certifying that an ifp appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 4/20/11. (kpr)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
LITTLE ROCK DIVISION
ROBERT JAMES BLY
v.

PLAINTIFF
CASE NO: 4:10cv01665 BSM

KIM DODSON, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States
Magistrate Judge H. David Young have been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After
careful consideration, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended
disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1.

Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to

comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and failure to respond to the December 3, 2010, order.
2.

It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and

judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
DATED this 20th day of April, 2011.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE