Brown v. Andrews et al

Filing 36

ORDER adopting 8 Magistrate Judge Deere's recommendation. Brown's access-to-courts claim and his claims against Ross and Branch are dismissed without prejudice. His claim about Randall's handling of his grievance is also dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/30/11. (hph)

-BD Brown v. Andrews et al

Doc. 36

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION

RICKY MARSHALL BROWN
ADC #551211

PLAINTIFF

v.

Case No. 4:10-cv-2014-DPM-BD

GARY ANDREWS, ROSS,
KARL BYRD, BRANCH,
JOHN RANDALL

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
The Court has considered Magistrate Judge Beth Deere's Partial Recommended Disposition, Document No.8, and Ricky Brown's objections,
Document Nos. 15 & 19. After de novo review, the Court adopts Magistrate

Judge Deere's recommendation (except for the citation to the Bilal v. Lockhart case) as the Court's decision. FED.R.ClV.P. 72(b)(3). Brown's access-to-courts claim and his claims against Ross and Branch are dismissed without prejudice. His claim about Randall's handling of his grievance is also

dismissed without prejudice.

Dockets.Justia.com

So Ordered.

D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
30 March 2011

-2