Edwards v. Byrd et al

Filing 38

ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray's proposed findings and recommended disposition; and dismissing the John Doe defendants without prejudice. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 9/9/11. (hph)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK DIVISION CECIL EDWARDS, JR. ADC #601363 et al. v. PLAINTIFFS CASE NO. 4:10CV02042 BSM/JTR KARL BYRD, Sheriff, Faulkner County et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommended partial disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray have been reviewed. No objections were filed. After carefully considering theis documents and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended partial disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), the John Doe defendants are dismissed, without prejudice, due to a lack of service. 2. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Dated this 9th day of September 2011. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?