Watts v. Stewart et al

Filing 14

ORDER ADOPTING 12 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, pltf's claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; this dismissal counts as a "strike"; an ifp appeal of this dismissal would be frivolous and not taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 5/31/11. (vjt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION

KEVIN J. WATTS
V.

PLAINTIFF
No. 4:11CV00023 SWW-BD

GARY STEWART, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has received the Recommended Disposition from Magistrate Judge
Beth Deere. The parties have not filed objections. After careful review of the
recommendation, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the
Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this
Court’s findings in all respects.
Accordingly, Mr. Watts’s claim is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court
certifies that this dismissal of this action will count as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(g). An in forma pauperis appeal of this dismissal would be frivolous and not
taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of May, 2011.

/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE