Watts v. Stewart et al
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING 12 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, pltf's claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; this dismissal counts as a "strike"; an ifp appeal of this dismissal would be frivolous and not taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 5/31/11. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
KEVIN J. WATTS
V.
PLAINTIFF
No. 4:11CV00023 SWW-BD
GARY STEWART, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has received the Recommended Disposition from Magistrate Judge
Beth Deere. The parties have not filed objections. After careful review of the
recommendation, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the
Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this
Court’s findings in all respects.
Accordingly, Mr. Watts’s claim is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Court
certifies that this dismissal of this action will count as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(g). An in forma pauperis appeal of this dismissal would be frivolous and not
taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of May, 2011.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?