Kerrigan et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al

Filing 34

ORDER reflecting Dr. Cashs supplemental affidavit clarifies the nadus issue. But Defendants have now made strong arguments about the weaknesses in the foundation of Dr. Cash's opinion on causation. If Kerrigan wishes to be heard on those issues, he should file a sur-reply by Wednesday, August 15th. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 08/13/2012. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
WARREN KERRIGAN
v.

PLAINTIFF
No. 4:11-cv-53-DPM

JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.;
ETHICON, INC.; and JOHN DOES I–X

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
Dr. Cash’s supplemental affidavit clarifies the nadus issue.

But

Defendants have now made strong arguments about the weaknesses in the
foundation of Dr. Cash’s opinion on causation. If Kerrigan wishes to be heard
on those issues, he should file a sur-reply by Wednesday, August 15th.
So Ordered.

__________________________________
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
13 August 2012