Emerson v. Arkansas, State of
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 10 and dismissing complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; denying all pending motions as moot; and counting dismissal of pltf's complaint as a "strike". Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 4/12/11. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TINA MARIE EMERSON,
STATE OF ARKANSAS,
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff’s objections. After carefully considering
the objections and making a de novo review of the record1, the Court concludes that the Proposed
Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their
entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to
state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
All pending motions are denied as moot.
Dismissal of Plaintiff’s Complaint constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the
Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(G).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of April, 2011.
JAMES M. MOODY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The Court has reviewed the pleadings filed by Plaintiff since the filing of the Proposed
Findings and Recommended Disposition, docket #’s 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20. The
pleadings and argument do not alter the findings of the Court and the motions have no merit.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?