Parkison v. Halliburton Energy Services Inc et al
Filing
19
ORDER granting 9 Motion to Dismiss of the Express Energy Defendants and dismissing those claims without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/8/11. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
CLINTON PARKISON
v.
PLAINTIFFS
Case No. 4:11-cv-265-DPM
HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES,
INC.; CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORP.;
CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, INC.;
CEHSAPEAKE MIDSTREAM OPERATING,
LLC; CHESAPEAKE MIDSTREAM GAS
SERVICES, LLC; CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION,
LLC; CHESAPEAKE ENERGY MARKETING,
INC.; NOMAC DRILLING, LLC; GREAT
PLAINS OILFIELD RENTAL, LLC;
EXPRESS ENERGY SERVICES ARK, LP;
EXPRESS ENERGY SERVICES GP, LLC;
EXPRESS ENERGY SERVICES OPERATING,
LP; and JOHN DOES 1-10
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Parkison's claims against the Express Energy Defendants" run afoul of
the automatic stay because those companies are in bankruptcy. Those claims
are therefore dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction. Parkison may move to amend and reassert those claims if he
"Express Energy Services Ark, LP; Express Energy Services GP, LLC;
and Express Energy Services Operating, LP
succeeds in getting relief from the stay in the bankruptcy court. Motion to
dismiss, Document No.9, granted.
So Ordered.
-2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?