Parkison v. Halliburton Energy Services Inc et al

Filing 19

ORDER granting 9 Motion to Dismiss of the Express Energy Defendants and dismissing those claims without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/8/11. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION CLINTON PARKISON v. PLAINTIFFS Case No. 4:11-cv-265-DPM HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.; CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORP.; CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, INC.; CEHSAPEAKE MIDSTREAM OPERATING, LLC; CHESAPEAKE MIDSTREAM GAS SERVICES, LLC; CHESAPEAKE EXPLORATION, LLC; CHESAPEAKE ENERGY MARKETING, INC.; NOMAC DRILLING, LLC; GREAT PLAINS OILFIELD RENTAL, LLC; EXPRESS ENERGY SERVICES ARK, LP; EXPRESS ENERGY SERVICES GP, LLC; EXPRESS ENERGY SERVICES OPERATING, LP; and JOHN DOES 1-10 DEFENDANTS ORDER Parkison's claims against the Express Energy Defendants" run afoul of the automatic stay because those companies are in bankruptcy. Those claims are therefore dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Parkison may move to amend and reassert those claims if he "Express Energy Services Ark, LP; Express Energy Services GP, LLC; and Express Energy Services Operating, LP succeeds in getting relief from the stay in the bankruptcy court. Motion to dismiss, Document No.9, granted. So Ordered. -2­

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?