Coles v. Hahn
Filing
52
ORDER directing the Clerk to send copies of this Order and document nos. 46-51 to Coles at his new address in San Antonio, Texas; and all counsel are directed to notice the change of address filed by Coles on August 24, 2011, document no. 32. Coles has until January 6, 2012 to respond to the motion to dismiss, and reply to the response to his motion for summary judgment. The Court has received Baptist Health's request for a hearing on pending motions, but will wait to see if and how Coles responds before determining if a hearing is necessary. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/16/11. (Attachments: # 1 Document Letter)(kpr)
MITCHELL
WILLIAMS
Megan D. Hargraves
Direct Dial: 501-688-8871
Fax: 501-918-7871
E-mail: mhargraves@mwlaw.com
425 West Capitol Avenue. Suite 1800
Little Rock. Arkansas 72201-3525
Telephone: 501-688-8800
Fax: 501-688-8807
December 8, 2011
D. P. Marshall, Jr.
United States District Court Judge
600 W. Capitol Ave., Room B155
Little Rock, AR 72201
Re: Cecil A. Coles v. Herbert L. Hahn, MD., et al
USDC Eastern District Western Division 4:11-cv-272-DPM
Dear Judge Marshall:
We represent separate defendant Baptist Health in the above-referenced matter.
We are writing to request that a hearing be scheduled at the Court's earliest convenience
on our Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, Insufficiency of Process and
Insufficiency of Service of Process (Doc. #47) and Motion in Response to Plaintiffs Motion for
Summary Judgment (Doc. #49).
If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at the number
above.
Cordially,
MITCHELL, WILLIAMS, SELIG,
GATES & WOODYARD, P.L.L.c.
By
MDH/dw
cc:
William M. Griffin, Esq.
Bradley S. Runyon, Esq.
Cecil A. Coles, Pro Se
I Attorneys at Law
I MitchellWilliamsLaw.com
Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, P.L.L.c.
Little RockĀ· Rogers' Austin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?