Hannahs v. Johnson et al

Filing 134

ORDER granting 132 Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel; relieving attorney Lawrence Chisenhall as counsel in this matter; appointing Attorney Steven W. Quattlebaum; directing the Clerk to send Mr. Quattlebaum a copy of this Order; and directing Mr. Quattlebaum to review Local Rules 83.7 and 83.6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 5/31/2013. (srw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION GABE HANNAHS, ADC # 117222 v. PLAINTIFF 4:11CV00278-JMM-JJV CARL LYNN JOHNSON, Dr., Pulaski County Detention Facility; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER On May 8, 2013, this Court appointed Lawrence E. Chisenhall, with the law firm of Chisenhall, Nestrud, & Julian, P.A., to represent Mr. Hannahs in this matter. (Doc. No. 131.) Mr. Chisenhall has filed a Motion to Withdraw as counsel. (Doc. No. 132.) The Court finds that the Motion is well taken and for good cause the Motion (Doc. No. 132) is GRANTED. Mr. Chisenhall is, hereby, relieved as counsel of record for Mr. Hannahs. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) and Local Rule 83.7, Steven W. Quattlebaum, with the law firm of Quattlebaum, Grooms, Tull & Burrow PLLC, 111 Center Street, Suite 1900, Little Rock, AR 72201-3325, is appointed to represent Mr. Hannahs in all further proceedings in this action. THE CLERK shall send Mr. Quattlebaum and Mr. Hannahs a copy of this Order. Counsel shall review Local Rule 83.7 regarding appointment of counsel, and Local Rule 83.6 regarding reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, through the Court’s web site (www.are.uscourts.gov).1 Pursuant to Rule 83.7, counsel must make written application to withdraw within twenty-one (21) days; otherwise, the appointment will be effective. IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of May, 2013. ____________________________________ JOE J. VOLPE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 Counsel may obtain a copy of the case file on disk by contacting the Courtroom Deputy.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?