Hannahs v. Johnson et al

Filing 54

ORDER ADOPTING 47 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 41 MOTION for Default Judgment against Carl Lynn Johnson filed by Gabe Hannahs. The Clerk shall prepare summons for deft Johnson. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve a copy of th e complaint, amended complaints and summons on deft without prepayment of costs in care of Catherine M. Corless, Mitchell Williams Selig Gates & Woodyard, PLLC, 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 1800, Little Rock, AR 72201-3525Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 12/9/11. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION GABE HANNAHS, ADC # 117222 v. PLAINTIFF 4:11-cv-00278-JMM-JJV CARL LYNN JOHNSON, Dr., Pulaski County Detention Facility; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff’s objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. No. 41) is DENIED without prejudice. 2. The Clerk of the Court shall prepare summons for Defendant Johnson. 3. The United States Marshal is directed to serve a copy of the Complaint (Doc. No. 2), Amended Complaints (Doc. Nos. 10, 14) and summons on Defendant without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore to: Catherine M. Corless Mitchell Williams Selig Gates & Woodyard, PLLC 425 W. Capitol Avenue, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201-3525 . DATED this 9th day of December, 2011. JAMES M. MOODY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?