Hannahs v. Johnson et al
Filing
54
ORDER ADOPTING 47 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 41 MOTION for Default Judgment against Carl Lynn Johnson filed by Gabe Hannahs. The Clerk shall prepare summons for deft Johnson. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve a copy of th e complaint, amended complaints and summons on deft without prepayment of costs in care of Catherine M. Corless, Mitchell Williams Selig Gates & Woodyard, PLLC, 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 1800, Little Rock, AR 72201-3525Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 12/9/11. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
GABE HANNAHS,
ADC # 117222
v.
PLAINTIFF
4:11-cv-00278-JMM-JJV
CARL LYNN JOHNSON, Dr.,
Pulaski County Detention Facility; et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff’s objections. After carefully
considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the
Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and
adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED THAT:
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. No. 41) is DENIED without prejudice.
2.
The Clerk of the Court shall prepare summons for Defendant Johnson.
3.
The United States Marshal is directed to serve a copy of the Complaint (Doc. No.
2), Amended Complaints (Doc. Nos. 10, 14) and summons on Defendant without
prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore to:
Catherine M. Corless
Mitchell Williams Selig Gates & Woodyard, PLLC
425 W. Capitol Avenue, Suite 1800
Little Rock, AR 72201-3525 .
DATED this 9th day of December, 2011.
JAMES M. MOODY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?