Moore et al v. Sherman et al

Filing 23

ORDER directing pltfs to respond to the Court's 21 Order directing them to file a 26(f) Report no later than 14 days from the entry of this Order; failure to comply may result in the dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 3/23/12. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION ALVESTER MOORE and SHARON MOORE, * * * * * * * * * * * Plaintiffs, vs. JAMES SHERMAN, ET AL., Defendant. No. 4:11CV00376 SWW Order Plaintiffs filed their complaint on May 2, 2011. On July 7, 2011, the Court entered an Order directing pro se plaintiffs to be familiar and comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of this Court. After ruling on a motion to dismiss, on September 1, 2011, the Court granted plaintiffs’ motion for an extension of time to conduct the Rule 26(f) report. On January 9, 2012, the Court directed counsel to file the Rule 26(f) report forthwith. No Rule 26(f) report has been filed; it appears that plaintiffs do not wish to pursue this action. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiffs shall respond to the Court’s January 9, 2012, order directing them to file a 26(f) report no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of entry of this Order. If plaintiffs fail to comply with this Order, the Court will be inclined to dismiss this matter for failure to prosecute this action and abide by the orders of this Court. DATED this 23rd day of March, 2012. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?