Polk v. Pulaski County Detention Facility et al

Filing 91

ORDER re 14 PARTIAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Court now clarifies that Polk's claims against Pulaski County are also dismissed as duplicative. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/16/11. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION ALLEN POLK #1902-11 v., PLAINTIFF No.4:11-cv-407-DPM-BD SHAWN SMITH; DOC HOLLADAY; PULASKI COUNTY; JOE GARZA; RANDY MORGAN; NANCY BRAWLEY; DOWNS WARNER; ISSAC AKINS; MCKINLEY SCOTT; JOHN THOMAS; BROOKS; VIVALON NELSON; VERNESSIA BRYANT; MICHELLE CONORS; SYLVIA WILSON; LATASHA SMITH; and EDDIEMAE BANKS DEFENDANTS ORDER In its 28 July 2011 Order, the Court adopted Magistrate Judge Beth Deere's partial recommended disposition, Document No. 14, as its own and dismissed Allen Polk's claims against the Pulaski County Detention Facility, the Pulaski County Sheriff's Department, and Defendant Villines. Although Magistrate Judge Deere also recommended that Polk's claims against Pulaski County be dismissed as duplicative, Document No. 14, at 3, the Court neglected to say that those claims were dismissed as well. Because the Court intended to adopt the entirety of Magistrate Judge Deere's partial recommended disposition, the Court now clarifies that Polk's claims against Pulaski County are also dismissed as duplicative. So Ordered. D.~~· United States District Judge -2­

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?