Nelson v. Holladay et al
ORDER ADOPTING the 7 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing Plaintiff's complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim for which relief may be granted; finding that this dismissal counts as a strike and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 7/25/11. (pag)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
LITTLE ROCK DIVISION
KEVIN EVETTE NELSON
NO: 4:11CV00467 SWW
DOC HOLLADAY et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim
upon which relief may be granted.
This dismissal counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and
judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
DATED this 25th day of July, 2011.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?