Morton et al v. Luken et al

Filing 46

ORDER allowing pltfs up to and including 2/24/12 to supplement their response to defts' 30 MOTION for Attorney's Fees and Costs. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 2/14/12. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LARRY E. MORTON and RETRO TELEVISION NETWORK, INC., Plaintiffs, vs. HENRY G. LUKEN, III; LUKEN COMMUNICATIONS, LLC; and RETRO TELEVISION, INC., f/k/a RETRO PROGRAMING SERVICES, INC., Defendants. * * * * * * * * * * * * * No. 4:11-cv-00489-SWW ORDER The plaintiffs have responded [doc.#42] to defendants’ motion for attorney’s fees and costs [doc.#30] by, inter alia, questioning whether the Court has jurisdiction and, if it does, requesting the opportunity to conduct discovery regarding the invoices presented to the Court. The Court informs plaintiffs that it does indeed have jurisdiction and that it will not allow discovery with respect to defendants’ motion for attorney’s fees and costs. The Court will allow plaintiffs until and including February 24, 2012, in which to supplement their response to defendants’ motion for attorney’s fees and costs should they so choose. IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of February 2012. /s/Susan Webber Wright UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?