Polk v. Pulaski County et al
ORDER, that the Plaintiff shall file, within thirty days, a Response to docket entry # 43 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Eddie Seaton, James McKenzie. Plaintiff is advised that failure to timely do so will result in the dismissal of this action, without prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 10/06/2011. (kcs)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PULASKI COUNTY, et. al.
Separate Defendants Seaton and McKenzie have filed a Motion to Dismiss and
a Supporting Brief. See docket entries #43 and #44. The Court will give Plaintiff
thirty days to file a Response to that Motion
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
Plaintiff shall file, within thirty days of the entry of this Order, a
Response to Defendant Seaton’s and McKenzie’ Motion to Dismiss (docket entry
Plaintiff is advised that his failure to timely do so will result in the
dismissal of this action, without prejudice, pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).1
Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) provides, in pertinent part that: “If any communication
from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to within thirty (30) days, the case
may be dismissed without prejudice.”
Dated this 6th day of October, 2011.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?