Delock et al v. Securitas Security Services USA Inc et al
Filing
73
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 65 Motion to Dismiss. The Court approves the settlement agreement and orders the settlement document, document no. 67, be unsealed. The complaint in this case is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/30/12. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
DAVID DELOCK; ALISHA
MEREDITH; ERIC MOTLEY;
STEPHEN CARLSON; DEBORAH
GOLDHORN; JOHNNY BROWN;
BOBBY WALKER; TIMOTHY PIERCE;
BRIAN PEASE; CHRIS WILSON;
NICHOLE LEDFORD; BRIAN
HATHAWAY; and STEVE BUCKER,
all individually and on behalf of others
similarly situated
v.
PLAINTIFFS
No. 4:11-cv-520-DPM
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES
USA, INC. and SECURITAS SERVICES,
INC.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Last month the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this case with
prejudice, keep the settlement agreement under seal, and for approval of the
settlement. Document No. 65. The Court's Memorandum Opinion of 16
November 2012 stated its intention "to give final approval and unseal the
settlement documents promptly on 30 November 2012 unless the parties
advise the Court before then that making the details public means there is no
settlement and the cases should therefore stay on the docket for adjudication."
Document No. 70. The parties have not objected. Their motion, Document No.
65, is therefore granted in part and denied in part. The Court approves the
settlement agreement and orders the settlement documents, Document No. 67,
unsealed. The complaint in this case is dismissed with prejudice.
So Ordered.
1/
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
3 o Af Ne Mb.tt. :zo 1;>-
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?