Richard et al v. Lonoke County, Arkansas et al

Filing 70

JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 69 Opinion and Order entered separately today, all of the claims of the plaintiffs that arise under the constitution and laws of the United States are dismissed with prejudice. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the claims of the plaintiffs that arise under the laws of the State of Arkansas, so those claims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/18/2014. (ks)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
JERRY RICHARD;
AE SAYASAVANH SAMONTRY;
and PORNPIEMON PHOUANGMANY
v.

PLAINTIFFS

NO. 4:11CV00551 JLH

LONOKE COUNTY, ARKANSAS;
JIM ROBERSON, individually and in his official
capacity as a member of the Lonoke County
Sheriff’s Department; JAMES KULESA,
individually and in his official capacity as a member
of the Lonoke County Sheriff’s Department;
KEENAN CARTER, individually and in his official
capacity as a member of the Lonoke County
Sheriff’s Department; KEVIN BLAKELY;
and BONNIE BLAKELY

DEFENDANTS

JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Opinion and Order entered separately today, all of the claims of the plaintiffs
that arise under the constitution and laws of the United States are dismissed with prejudice. The
Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the claims of the plaintiffs that arise under
the laws of the State of Arkansas, so those claims are dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of August, 2014.

__________________________________
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE