Richard et al v. Lonoke County, Arkansas et al

Filing 8

ORDER directing pro se deft Kevin Blakely to be familiar and comply with all the FRCP and Local Rules of this Court; the Clerk is directed to serve this Order on Kevin Blakely by both regular and certified mail. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 11/15/11. (vjt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION JERRY RICHARD; AE SAYASAVANH SAMONTRY; and PORNPIEMON PHOUANGMANY v. PLAINTIFFS NO. 4:11CV00551 JLH LONOKE COUNTY, ARKANSAS; JIM ROBERSON, individually and in his official capacity as a member of the Lonoke County Sheriff’s Department; JAMES KULESA, individually and in his official capacity as a member of the Lonoke County Sheriff’s Department; KEENAN CARTER, individually and in his official capacity as a member of the Lonoke County Sheriff’s Department; KEVIN BLAKELY; and BONNIE BLAKELY DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court’s attention has been directed to the fact that separate defendant KEVIN BLAKELY herein is presently proceeding pro se. The purpose of this Order is to direct defendant’s attention to the fact that he is required to be familiar and comply with all the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as well as the Local Rules of this Court. Failure to comply may result in default judgment being entered against him. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are available in many libraries and bookstores and the Local Rules can be obtained from the United States District Court Clerk for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Defendant is hereby instructed to be familiar and comply with said Rules. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve this Order on separate defendant KEVIN BLAKELY by both regular mail and certified mail, return receipt requested. IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of November, 2011. _________________________________ J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?