Richard et al v. Lonoke County, Arkansas et al
Filing
8
ORDER directing pro se deft Kevin Blakely to be familiar and comply with all the FRCP and Local Rules of this Court; the Clerk is directed to serve this Order on Kevin Blakely by both regular and certified mail. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 11/15/11. (vjt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION
JERRY RICHARD; AE SAYASAVANH
SAMONTRY; and PORNPIEMON PHOUANGMANY
v.
PLAINTIFFS
NO. 4:11CV00551 JLH
LONOKE COUNTY, ARKANSAS;
JIM ROBERSON, individually and in his official
capacity as a member of the Lonoke County
Sheriff’s Department; JAMES KULESA, individually
and in his official capacity as a member of the
Lonoke County Sheriff’s Department;
KEENAN CARTER, individually and in his official
capacity as a member of the Lonoke County
Sheriff’s Department; KEVIN BLAKELY;
and BONNIE BLAKELY
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court’s attention has been directed to the fact that separate defendant KEVIN
BLAKELY herein is presently proceeding pro se.
The purpose of this Order is to direct defendant’s attention to the fact that he is required to
be familiar and comply with all the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as well as the Local Rules of
this Court. Failure to comply may result in default judgment being entered against him. The Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure are available in many libraries and bookstores and the Local Rules can be
obtained from the United States District Court Clerk for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Defendant
is hereby instructed to be familiar and comply with said Rules.
The Clerk of Court is directed to serve this Order on separate defendant KEVIN BLAKELY
by both regular mail and certified mail, return receipt requested.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of November, 2011.
_________________________________
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?