Linzy v. Lawman et al
ORDER staying the pending 16 Motion for Summary Judgment and plaintiff's time to respond to the pending motion until one week after the entry of an Order from the Court addressing whether Mr. Lawman is required to reveal the name of the confidential source; and granting 20 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/25/13. (kpr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
Case No. 4:11-cv-00615 KGB
DAVID LAWMAN, et al.
Before the Court is plaintiff’s motion to stay a ruling of the Court on defendants’ motion
for summary judgment and to order defendant, David Lawman, to reveal the name of the
confidential source (Dkt. No. 20). To the extent plaintiff seeks to compel Mr. Lawman to reveal
the name of the confidential source, the Court will permit defendants to respond to plaintiff’s
motion. Following the receipt of defendants’ response, the Court will issue promptly a ruling on
whether Mr. Lawman is required to reveal the name of the confidential source.
The Court’s consideration of the pending summary judgment motion (Dkt. No. 16), and
plaintiff’s time to respond to the pending motion, are stayed until one week after the entry of an
Order from the Court addressing whether Mr. Lawman is required to reveal the name of the
SO ORDERED this 25th day of October, 2013.
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?