Eckardt v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Filing 49

ORDER granting 48 Motion to Dismiss the sex discrimination and retaliation claims in Counts 5 and 6. Plaintiff should file an amended complaint no later than 5 p.m., Thursday, October 6, 2011. Deft may file an answer to the amended complaint within 14 days of the filing of the amended complaint. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 9/22/11. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION BETSY ECKARDT v. PLAINTIFF 4:11-cv-00630-BRW HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY DEFENDANT ORDER Pending is Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Dismiss State Law Claims. (Doc. No. 48). Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Defendant alleging: (1) sex discrimination in violation of Title VII; (2) retaliation in violation of Title VII; (3) violation of Equal Pay Act; (4) retaliation in violation of Equal Pay Act; (5) sex discrimination in violation of the California Fair Employment & Housing Act (“FEHA”); and (6) retaliation in violation of FEHA.1 Plaintiff now wants to dismiss the sex discrimination and retaliation claims in Counts 5 and 6. Plaintiff has conferred with Defendant, and Defendant has no objection. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion (Doc. No. 48) is GRANTED. Plaintiff should file an amended complaint no later than 5:00 p.m., Thursday, October 6, 2011. Defendant may file an answer to the amended complaint within 14 days of the filing of the amended complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of September, 2011. /s/Billy Roy Wilson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Doc. No. 1.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?