Bradley v. Strong et al

Filing 23

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to respond to this Court's January 23, 2012, Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 2/27/12. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION DINO LERONE BRADLEY, v. PLAINTIFF 4:11-cv-00737-JTK DEPUTY STRONG, et al DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER On January 23, 2012, this Court entered an Order directing Plaintiff to file an updated Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis within fifteen days, based on his release from incarceration (Doc. No. 20). The Court further advised Plaintiff that failure to file such in accordance with the Court’s directions would result in the dismissal without prejudice of his Complaint. As of this date, Plaintiff has not filed a Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, or otherwise corresponded with this Court. Rule LR5.5(c)(2) of the Rules of the United States District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas provides as follows: It is the duty of any party not represented by counsel to promptly notify the Clerk and the other parties to the proceedings of any change in his or her address, to monitor the progress of the case and to prosecute or defend the action diligently . . . . If any communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to within thirty (30) days, the case may be dismissed without prejudice. . . . In light of Plaintiff’s failure to respond to this Court's January 23, 2012 Order, the Court will dismiss the Complaint without prejudice. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that this Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of February, 2012. _______________________________ JEROME T. KEARNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?