McCall v. Sanders et al

Filing 12

ORDER declining the 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and referring the case back to Judge Ray to screen McCall's proposed complaint and make a recommendation on t he embedded motion to amend. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 11/4/11. (kpr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

WESTERN DIVISION

JAMIE SHAWN MCCALL

#11962-11

v.

PLAINTIFF

No.4:11-cv-745-DPM-JTR

COTI SANDERS, Arkamark
Supervisor, Pulaski County
Detention Center; and STEVE
PINNINGTON, Aramark Supervisor,
Pulaski County Detention Center

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
The Court has considered Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray's Proposed
Findings and Recommended Disposition, Document No.8, and McCall's
objection, Document No. 10. The Court has conducted a de novo review; and
McCall's objection seems to acknowledge the force of Magistrate Judge Ray's
initial recommendation and asks for leave to amend the complaint to cure the
defects in the original pleading. The Court therefore declines to adopt the
proposal. And the Court refers this case back to Judge Ray to screen McCall's
proposed complaint and make a recommendation on the embedded motion
to amend.

So Ordered.

.

-2­