Adcock et al v. Resurgent Capital Services

Filing 68

ORDER withdrawing 60 Motion for Costs; finding as moot 62 Motion for Judgment; granting 63 Motion to Withdraw ; finding as moot 66 Motion for Settlement. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 9/25/12. (kpr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
WESTERN DIVISION

CHARLES E. ADCOCK and
DOVEY ADCOCK
VS.

PLAINTIFFS
No. 4:11-cv-00832 KGB

RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES
AS SERVICER FOR LVNV FUNDING, LLC

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
Defendant has moved to withdraw its motion for costs (Dkt. No. 60). For good cause shown,
defendant’s motion is granted (Dkt. No. 63). Also before the Court are plaintiffs’ motion for
judgment (Dkt. No. 62) and plaintiffs’ motion for settlement (Dkt. No. 66). The Court views these
motions as moot in light of the plaintiffs’ filing of a satisfaction of judgment but will deny them
without prejudice to refiling, should plaintiffs believe there are outstanding issues still to be
considered by the Court.
SO ORDERED this 25th day of September, 2012.

____________________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge