Adcock et al v. Resurgent Capital Services

Filing 68

ORDER withdrawing 60 Motion for Costs; finding as moot 62 Motion for Judgment; granting 63 Motion to Withdraw ; finding as moot 66 Motion for Settlement. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 9/25/12. (kpr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION CHARLES E. ADCOCK and DOVEY ADCOCK VS. PLAINTIFFS No. 4:11-cv-00832 KGB RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES AS SERVICER FOR LVNV FUNDING, LLC DEFENDANTS ORDER Defendant has moved to withdraw its motion for costs (Dkt. No. 60). For good cause shown, defendant’s motion is granted (Dkt. No. 63). Also before the Court are plaintiffs’ motion for judgment (Dkt. No. 62) and plaintiffs’ motion for settlement (Dkt. No. 66). The Court views these motions as moot in light of the plaintiffs’ filing of a satisfaction of judgment but will deny them without prejudice to refiling, should plaintiffs believe there are outstanding issues still to be considered by the Court. SO ORDERED this 25th day of September, 2012. ____________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?