Coker v. Arkansas State Police et al
Filing 101
ORDER regarding potential punitive damages. Having reflected further and re-read the applicable cases, the Court is convinced that it made a mistake on this issue. The Court concludes Cartwright had enough notice. The Court is convinced that it would be error in the circumstances, based on Bowles, to bar Coker from trying to make a submissible case for an award of exemplary damages. His oral motion to amend his complaint, made at the end of the 22 January 2015 pretrial, is denied. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/27/2015. (jak)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
